Nguyen

Nguyen v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20243:23-cv-01142California3,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAI NGUYEN, Case No. 23cv1142-JO (KSC)

CDCR #T-01859,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, vs. DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL, AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT PURUSANT TO

K. WILLIAMS, et al.,

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND Defendants. § 1915A(b)(1) 17 18 Plaintiff Dai Nguyen (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner incarcerated at Calipatria State Prison in Calipatria, California. Proceeding pro se, he filed this lawsuit alleging that correctional counselors violated his constitutional rights when they denied his several requests to transfer prisons. See Dkt. 1 (“Complaint”). Plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and filed a Motion to Appoint Counsel. Dkts. 2, 3. For the reasons explained below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s request to proceed IFP, denies his motion to appoint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.