Grausz
Grausz v. The Hershey Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EVA GRAUSZ, on behalf of herself, all Case No.: 23-cv-00028-AJB-SBC others similarly situated, and the general 12 public, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
v. (Doc. No. 35)
THE HERSHEY COMPANY,
17 Defendant.
19 Presently pending before the Court is Defendant the Hershey Company’s motion to 20 dismiss Plaintiff Eva Grausz’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal 21 Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 35.) Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion 22 to dismiss, (Doc. No. 37), to which Hershey replied, (Doc. No. 38). Pursuant to Civil Local 23 Rule 7.1.d.1, the Court finds the instant matter suitable for determination on the papers and 24 without oral argument. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS IN PART and 25 DENIES IN PART Hershey’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s SAC. 26 /// 27 /// 28 I. BACKGROUND Defendant Hershey manufactures and…