Bashinski Jr. v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN MACK BASHINSKI JR., Case No.: 23-cv-01026-JO-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION
AND AMENDING SCHEDULING
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ORDER
Defendant. [ECF No. 31] 16 17 Before the Court is the ex parte motion to modify the Scheduling Order filed by Plaintiff Martin Mack Bashinski Jr. (“Plaintiff”) (ECF No. 31), and the response filed by Defendant United States of America (“Defendant”) (ECF No. 34). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 31) and AMENDS the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 14). 23 24 Plaintiff entitled his filing “Plaintiff’s Motion to Object to Rule Mental Examination.” (ECF No. 31.) Based on content and context, the Court construed the filing 26 as both a motion to amend the Scheduling Order and Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 30). The Court issued a briefing…