Lopez
Lopez v. FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20243:23-cv-02155California316 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMA LOPEZ, individually and on Case No.: 23-cv-02155-JO-SBC behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO REMAND, DENYING
DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR
FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT
JUDICIAL NOTICE, DENYING SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1 through
PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR
50, inclusive,
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND
Defendants. DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
TO COMPEL
For the reasons stated on the record, the Court issues the following rulings. First, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand [Dkt. 6] because Defendant FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.’s (“Defendant FedEx”) has not met its burden to establish that the amount in controversy, when considering attorneys’ fees, more likely than not exceeds $75,000 as required to establish diversity jurisdiction. See Sanchez v. Monumental Life Ins. Co., 102 F.3d 398, 404 (9th…