Lopez

Lopez v. FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 31, 20243:23-cv-02155California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMA LOPEZ, individually and on Case No.: 23-cv-02155-JO-SBC behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO REMAND, DENYING

DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR

FEDEX OFFICE AND PRINT

JUDICIAL NOTICE, DENYING SERVICES, INC. and DOES 1 through

PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

50, inclusive,

ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND

Defendants. DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TO COMPEL

For the reasons stated on the record, the Court issues the following rulings. First, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand [Dkt. 6] because Defendant FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc.’s (“Defendant FedEx”) has not met its burden to establish that the amount in controversy, when considering attorneys’ fees, more likely than not exceeds $75,000 as required to establish diversity jurisdiction. See Sanchez v. Monumental Life Ins. Co., 102 F.3d 398, 404 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.