Jean-Baptiste

Jean-Baptiste v. California Coast Credit Union

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 6, 20243:23-cv-00533California3,089 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MACKENSON ROBENS JEAN- Case No.: 23cv533-LL-VET

BAPTISTE,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, COMPEL ARBITRATION v. 14 [ECF No. 6]

CALIFORNIA COAST CREDIT UNION,

15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant California Coast Credit Union (the “Credit Union”). ECF No. 6. Defendant filed a reply supporting its Motion [ECF No. 8] and Plaintiff filed responses in opposition both to the Motion [ECF No. 7] and the reply [ECF No. 9]. As an initial matter, the Court STRIKES Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s reply as a sur-reply filed without leave. See Hon. Linda Lopez, Civil Chambers Rules, 3E (“Sur-Replies and Notices of Supplemental Authority”). The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Upon review of the parties’ submissions and the applicable law, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.