Tijerina

Tijerina v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20243:22-cv-00203California888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEATRIZ TIJERINA, individually, Case No.: 22-CV-203 JLS (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE STRIKING

v. FILING IN VIOLATION OF LOCAL

RULES

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.,

an Alaska Corporation; and DOES 1–50, (ECF No. 97) Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendant Alaska Airlines, Inc.’s Motion in Limine and Objections to Plaintiff’s Witness List (“Mot.,” ECF No. 97). In ruling on the other motions in limine (“MILs”) previously filed by the Parties, the Court gave Defendant permission to file a renewed challenge regarding—among other topics—some of Plaintiff Beatriz Tijerina’s intended trial witnesses. See ECF No. 94 (the “Order”) at 22. The Court did not, however, grant Defendant leave to ignore applicable procedural rules. By filing the instant Motion on February 7, 2024, without first obtaining a hearing date from chambers, Defendant violated Civil Local Rules 7.1(b) and 7.1(f)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.