Hearn

Hearn v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 20243:22-cv-00255California2,217 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM HEARN, CDCR #AS-7111, Case No.: 22-cv-255-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RJD WARDEN, et al., MOTION TO APPOINT Defendants. COUNSEL WITHOUT

PREJUDICE;

16 (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO EFFECT

SERVICE OF SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

SUMMONS VIA UNITED

STATES MARSHALS SERVICE; and 21 (3) DEFERRING RULING ON

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS 24 [Dkt. Nos. 54, 55] 25 Plaintiff William Hearn (“Plaintiff”), an inmate previously incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego, California, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court are (1) Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Appoint Counsel (“Motion for Counsel”) [Dkt. No. 54];…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.