Avalos

Smith v. Avalos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20243:20-cv-01534California2,447 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUELL SMITH, Case No.: 20cv1534-JAH(LR) CDCR #H-83007 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY MOTION AND

Plaintiff, RENEWED REQUEST FOR v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

MS. AVALOS, Law Library Coordinator; [ECF No. 61] JOHN/JANE DOE, Medical Supervisor; JOHN/JANE DOE, Defendants. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Marquell Smith’s “Motion Per [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26] Requesting Discovery of the Names of John/ Jane Doe’s [and] Appointment of Counsel.” (See ECF No. 61.) The motion is fully briefed, and the Court determines that the matter is suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the hearing on the motion currently set for February 12, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion in its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.