Spencer

Spencer v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20243:22-cv-01622California2,400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELLEN S., Case No.: 22-cv-1622-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DENYING

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Acting

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION

Commissioner of Social Security,1 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. 16 [DKT. NOS. 13, 15] 17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Ellen S. seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability benefits. Dkt. No. 1.2 The parties filed cross-motions for Summary Judgment. Dkt. Nos. 13, 15. Plaintiff did not file a reply. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 13), DENIES Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary 24

1 Martin O’Malley is substituted for Kilolo Kijakazi pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 27 2 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last 28 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.