Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. JP Boden Services Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 REBEKAH RODRIGUEZ, et al, ) Case No. 23-cv-00534-L-VET 0 ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. ) MOTION TO DISMISS AND ) ) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO JP BODEN SERVICES INC., a Delaware ) COMPEL ARBITRATION [ECF NO. corporation d/b/a BODENUSA.COM, ) 15] ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) 20 Pending before the Court in this putative class action asserting violations of the 21 Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2710, is a motion to dismiss and 22 motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant JP Boden Services (“Boden” or 23 “Defendant”). The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral 24 argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the 25 Motion to Dismiss and denies the Motion to Compel Arbitration as moot. 26 27 I. FACTUAL…