Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. JP Boden Services Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20243:23-cv-00534California2,886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 REBEKAH RODRIGUEZ, et al, ) Case No. 23-cv-00534-L-VET 0 ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. ) MOTION TO DISMISS AND ) ) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO JP BODEN SERVICES INC., a Delaware ) COMPEL ARBITRATION [ECF NO. corporation d/b/a BODENUSA.COM, ) 15] ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) 20 Pending before the Court in this putative class action asserting violations of the 21 Video Privacy Protection Act (“VPPA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2710, is a motion to dismiss and 22 motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendant JP Boden Services (“Boden” or 23 “Defendant”). The Court decides the matters on the papers submitted and without oral 24 argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d.1). For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the 25 Motion to Dismiss and denies the Motion to Compel Arbitration as moot. 26 27 I. FACTUAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.