Sexton
Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN SEXTON, Case No.: 23-CV-00375-W-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. THIRD JOINT MOTION TO
AMEND
MITRATECH, INC.,
Defendant. [ECF 24]
16 On February 7, 2024, the parties filed a third joint motion to extend fact discovery, seeking to extend the current February 12, 2024, fact discovery deadline to a date 30 days beyond the district court’s disposition of the pending motion of Plaintiff’s counsel to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff. (ECF 19, 24.) According to the parties, counsel for Plaintiff is unable to represent Plaintiff at the February 9, 2024, deposition of Plaintiff. (ECF 24 at 4.) The parties seek the extension due to the impending February 12, 2024, fact discovery deadline. (ECF 24 at 4.) The motion is GRANTED IN PART. A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with a judge’s consent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. The inquiry under the good cause…