Baird

Baird v. Leidos, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20243:22-cv-00060California7,191 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN BAIRD, Case No.: 22cv0060-LL-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LEIDOS, INC., [ECF No. 46] Defendant. 16 Before the Court is Defendant Leidos, Inc.’s (“Defendant” or “Leidos”) Motion for Summary Judgment. ECF No. 46. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment has been fully briefed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Disputes The Court has taken the relevant facts from the parties’ declarations, exhibits, and from each of the parties’ respective Rule 56. statements of facts. ECF No. 46-2, Defendant’s Separate Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (“DSSUF”); ECF No. 47-2, Plaintiff’s Separate Statement of Disputed and Additional Material Facts (“PSSUF”). Based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.