Santillan

Santillan v. Verizon Connect Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20243:21-cv-01257California7,877 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 ANTONIO HIRAM SANTILLAN, on Case No.: 3:21-cv-1257-H-KSC behalf of all other similarly situated 15 aggrieved employees, ORDER: 16 Plaintiffs, (1) GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS, COLLECTIVE, AND v.

REPRESENTATIVE ACTION

18 VERIZON CONNECT, INC., a Delaware SETTLEMENT; AND corporation, and DOES 1 to 100, (2) APPROVING PLAINTIFF’S inclusive, REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ Defendants. FEES, COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE INCENTIVE AWARD

23 [Doc. No. 64.]

On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff Antonio Hiram Santillan (“Plaintiff”) filed an unopposed motion for final approval of class, collective, and representative action settlement and for attorneys’ fees, costs, and class representative incentive award. (Doc. No. 64.) On February 12, 2024, the Court held a final approval hearing on the matter. (Doc. No. 68.) Kevin Barnes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.