Casey

Casey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 7, 20243:22-cv-00653California5,194 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANYA C.1, Case No.: 22-CV-653-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

[ECF No. 9]

Defendant.

18 This Action arises from the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner” or 19 “Defendant”) denial of Tanya C.’s (“Plaintiff”) application for disability insurance benefits 20 under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”). On October 14, 2022, Plaintiff submitted 21 a Motion for Summary Judgment, seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision 22 denying Social Security benefits and requesting a remand for further administrative 23 proceedings. (Doc. No. 9). On November 18, 2022, Defendant filed a Cross-Motion for 24 25 26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), “[o]pinions by the Court in [Social Security cases under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)] will refer to any non-government parties by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.