White

White v. Benihana International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 12, 20243:23-cv-00888California1,926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MADISON WHITE, an Individual, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00888-L-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND AND

DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO

BENIHANA INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

CONTINUE

a Delaware stock corporation; 3C- 15 BENIHANA INTERNATIONAL, an unknown corporation; KEVIN SPEER, an [ECF No. 28, 31] individual, and DOES 1 through 10, 17 inclusive, 18 Defendants.

20 Pending before the Court in this employment hostile workplace lawsuit is Plaintiff 21 Madison White’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand the action to State court. (ECF No. 28.) 22 Defendant Benihana International, Inc.,1 (“Benihana”) filed an opposition and Plaintiff 23 replied. (ECF Nos. 29, 30.) The Court finds that the matter is appropriate for decision 24 without oral argument pursuant to Local Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, 25 26 1 Defendant Benihana International, Inc., is the only defendant that has made an appearance in this action. 3C-Benihana International is an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.