Estate of William Hayden Schuck v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 8, 20243:23-cv-00785California11,437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 23-cv-785-DMS-AHG ESTATE OF WILLIAM HAYDEN

SCHUCK, by and through his successors- ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND in-interest Sabrina Schuck and Timothy

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

Schuck; SABRINA SCHUCK,

CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE

individually and in her capacity as PARTNERS’ MOTION TO DISMISS successor-in-interest; and TIMOTHY SCHUCK, individually and in his capacity as successor-in-interest, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v.

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; BILL

GORE, in his individual capacity; KELLY MARTINEZ, in her individual capacity;

CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE

PARTNERS; JON MONTGOMERY, D.O., in his individual capacity; 22 JAMEELYN BARRERA, R.N., in her individual capacity; ROMEO DEGUZMAN, R.N., in his individual 24 capacity; EMILY LYMBURN, R.N., in her individual capacity; CARINA ECHON, R.N., in her individual capacity; 26 DEPUTY SUPERVISOR DOES 1-6, in their individual capacities; JENNIFER VIVONA, R.N., in her individual 28 capacity; THOMAS MACE, in his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.