Dunsmore

Dunsmore v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 14, 20243:20-cv-00406California7,955 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARRYL DUNSMORE, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-406-AJB-DDL

Plaintiffs, ORDER: v. 1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’

SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL;

15 DEPARTMENT, et al., and Defendants. 2) GRANTING MOTION TO

SEAL

18 [Dkt. Nos. 489, 490] 19 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Interrogatory Response. Dkt. No. 489. The Court heard argument on the Motion on February 6, 2024 (the “February 6 Discovery Hearing”) and again on February 9, 2024 (the “February 9 Discovery Hearing”). Concurrently with the Motion, Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Seal certain exhibits (the “Motion to Seal”), which Defendants join. See Dkt. Nos. 490, 502. For the reasons stated on the record at the February 6 and February 9 Discovery Hearings and in this Order, the Motion to Compel [Dkt. No. 489] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.