Flourney

Flourney v. Does 1-15

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 9, 20243:21-cv-01767California642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN FLOURNEY, Case No.: 21-cv-01767-RBM-BGS

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

Plaintiff,

MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF

v. SUBPOENA

KIES, Correctional Officer, [ECF No. 50] Defendants.

16 17 18 On December 29, 2023, Plaintiff filed a request for this Court to issue a subpoena to Defendant Kies for medical records regarding Kies’ Covid-19 testing and vaccination. (ECF 50) The Defendant filed his response objecting to the issuance of the subpoena. (ECF 52) The Court’s scheduling order had a deadline for fact discovery of July 14, 2023. (ECF 29) Plaintiff’s request was filed December 29, 2023, some 6 months after the close of fact discovery. The Plaintiff has not moved for an extension of fact discovery, as is required by the Court’s chamber rules. See Chamber Rule III.C.1-2 (All requests to amend the schedule should be made by filing a joint motion.) When the motion is made after time has expired,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.