Navarro

Williams v. Navarro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20243:18-cv-01318-DMS-BGSCalifornia2,173 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01318-DMS-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AND

AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES

OFFICER O. NAVARRO, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF No. 123] 16 Currently before this Court is Lance Williams’ (“Williams” or “Plaintiff”) “Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Award Attorney Fees of $10,000.” (ECF No. 123.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. I. Procedural History On June 18, 2018, Lance Williams (“Williams” or “Plaintiff”), a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2022, Defendants R. Katyal and S. Krittman, along with Plaintiff, filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendants R. Katyal and S. Krittman with prejudice.” (See ECF No. 119.) That same day, Defendants C. Bagnol, E. Estrada, N. Garsilaso, L.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.