Navarro
Williams v. Navarro
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:18-cv-01318-DMS-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AND
AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
OFFICER O. NAVARRO, et al.,
Defendants. [ECF No. 123] 16 Currently before this Court is Lance Williams’ (“Williams” or “Plaintiff”) “Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Award Attorney Fees of $10,000.” (ECF No. 123.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED. I. Procedural History On June 18, 2018, Lance Williams (“Williams” or “Plaintiff”), a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 1, 2022, Defendants R. Katyal and S. Krittman, along with Plaintiff, filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendants R. Katyal and S. Krittman with prejudice.” (See ECF No. 119.) That same day, Defendants C. Bagnol, E. Estrada, N. Garsilaso, L.…