Sandoval

Sandoval v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 16, 20243:23-cv-01461California2,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNY SANDOVAL, Case No.: 3:23-cv-1461-JES-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND [ECF No. 5] BORDER PROTECTION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

18 Before the Court is Defendant United States Custom and Border Protection’s 19 (“United States”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. ECF No. 5. The motion was 20 filed on November 30, 2023, and a hearing date was set for January 17, 2024. Id. 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.e.2, Plaintiffs’ opposition or statement of non-opposition 22 was due for filing no later than January 3, 2024. See CivLR 7.1.e.2 (“[E]ach party 23 opposing a motion, application or order to show cause must file that opposition or 24 statement of non-opposition with the Clerk and serve the movant or the movant’s 25 attorney not later than fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the noticed hearing.”) As of 26 the date of this order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.