Vashisht-Rota

Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services

Caution
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20243:20-cv-00321California638 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Aparna VASHISHT-ROTA, Case No.: 20-cv-0321-AGS-KSC Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

RECONSIDERATION MOTION

v. (ECF 263), STRIKING FILING HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, (ECF 318), AND DENYING AS MOOT et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 7 Defendants. STRIKE (ECF 319)

This Court previously dismissed all plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s claims with prejudice and ordered her to file nothing further “except a motion for reconsideration or notice of appeal.” (ECF 234, at 18.) Since then, Vashisht-Rota has docketed five filings styled as “motions for reconsideration.” (See ECF 237, 239, 244, 245, 263.) The Court found “no basis to reconsider” the first (ECF 240, at 3 (denying ECF 237)); no “issues for reconsideration” in the second (id. (denying ECF 239)); and that the third and fourth did “not seek reconsideration of any ruling” (ECF 259, at 2–3 (denying ECF 244, 245)). This motion (ECF 263) is the fifth and final of the series, and it is similarly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.