Carr

Carr v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 20243:21-cv-00900California1,757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL D. CARR, Case No.: 21-cv-0900-MMA-MMP

12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EXPANSION OF v. TRIAL RECORD UNDER 2254 14 RULE 7(a) AND JEFF MACOMBER, RECONSIDERATION OF

PETITIONER’S RULE 6 MOTION

16 Respondent. FOR CAUSE 17 18 19 Petitioner Paul D. Carr (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. [ECF Nos. 1, 8.] Before the Court is Petitioner’s Motion for Expansion of Trial Record Under 2254 Rule 7(a) and Reconsideration of Petitioner’s Rule Motion for Cause (“Motion”). [ECF No. 53.] For the reasons discussed below, Petitioner’s Motion is DENIED. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Petitioner filed his petition for habeas corpus in this court, challenging his confinement as a result of his conviction for first degree murder and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.