Dawes

Dawes v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20243:19-cv-02122California1,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM DAWES, Case No. 19-cv-2122-MMA (VET)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

vs.

CONSTRUING MOTIONS TO LIFT

HOWARD AUSBURY, et al.

STAY AS MOTIONS FOR

Defendants. RECONSIDERATION;

16 [Doc. Nos. 84, 86]

DENYING MOTIONS FOR

RECONSIDERATION

19 [Doc. Nos. 84, 86]

21 Plaintiff William Dawes, a California inmate proceeding pro se, has brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Ausbury, Bravo, Gene, Ugalde, Silva, Shellano, Ayala, Solis, and Zuniga. See Doc. No. 13. The parties previously moved to stay these proceedings for a period of six months pending the outcome of related criminal proceedings in state court. See Doc. No. 68; see also S.D. Sup. Ct. No. SCS287189. The Court agreed and extended the stay through February 16, 2024. See Doc. No. 69. Defendants filed a Status Report on February 6, 2024 advising the Court that a further stay is warranted due to continued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.