Beury

Beury v. Hertz Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20243:23-cv-01886California2,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONALD D. BEURY, Case No.: 23-CV-1886-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

HERTZ CORPORATION et al., [Doc. No. 13] Defendants. 15 16 This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (“FAC”) filed by Defendants Hertz Corporation, Hertz Global Holdings, and Thrifty Rent A Car (collectively, the “Hertz Defendants”). The motion has been fully briefed, and the Court finds it suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. See S.D. Cal. CivLR 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted, and Plaintiff’s claims against the Hertz Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. I. Background1 On February 10, 2023, Plaintiff Donald Beury filed the complaint in this lawsuit against Hertz Corporation and Shaun Stone in San Diego County Superior Court. The

27 1 Most of this background was previously set…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.