Beck

Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20243:22-cv-01616California1,077 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Justin S. BECK, Case No.: 22-cv-1616-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING SECOND CATANZARITE LAW CORPORATION,

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF 37)

et al., WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; Defendants. 9 (2) DENYING AS MOOT ALL PENDING MOTIONS (ECF 39, 41, 43, 45, 54, 55, 64, 70); AND

(3) CLOSING CASE

14 Plaintiff Justin Beck’s second amended complaint cures none of the deficiencies identified in the first. (See ECF 35 (dismissing first amended complaint).) So, it must be dismissed. BACKGROUND This case appears to arise from a securities action against Beck that has snowballed into multiple litigations, rolling up additional defendants along the way. From what the Court can glean from the second amended complaint, Beck contends defendant Kenneth Catanzarite and his shareholder clients brought a “false derivative action” against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.