Justin S. Beck v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20243:23-cv-00164California788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Justin S. BECK, Case No.: 23-cv-0164-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING SECOND STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF 38)

Defendants. WITH PREJUDICE;

9 (2) DENYING AS MOOT ALL PENDING MOTIONS (ECF 39, 40, 41, 42); AND

(3) CLOSING CASE 13 “Plaintiffs generally have no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant.” Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union Int’l, 30 F.4th 879, 886 (9th Cir. 2022) (quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, plaintiff Justin Beck’s complaint must be dismissed. BACKGROUND Beck’s second amended complaint, like his first, is largely unintelligible. (See ECF 37, at 3) (finding Beck’s first amended complaint “nearly impossible to follow and far from simple, concise, and direct”). As far as the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.