Beck

Beck v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20243:23-cv-00882California786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Justin S. BECK, Case No.: 23-cv-0882-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

COMPLAINT (ECF 17) WITH

COUNTY OF ORANGE,

PREJUDICE; Defendant. 9 (2) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS (ECF 18); AND

(3) CLOSING CASE 13 “Plaintiffs generally have no right to maintain two separate actions involving the same subject matter at the same time in the same court and against the same defendant.” Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union Int’l, 30 F.4th 879, 886 (9th Cir. 2022) (quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, plaintiff Justin Beck’s complaint must be dismissed. BACKGROUND Beck’s first amended complaint, like the original complaint, is largely unintelligible. (See ECF 16, at 2) (finding Beck’s complaint “unfocused and difficult to follow”). As far as the Court can tell,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.