Davila

Davila v. Cohan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 20243:23-cv-01532California6,411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROCIO DAVILA, Case No.: 23-CV-1532 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

ERIC S. COHAN; STEPHANIE (ECF No. 4) SYPTAK-RAMNATH; and ANTONY

BLINKEN,

16 Defendants. 17 Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss (“Mot.,” ECF No. 4) filed by Defendants Eric S. Cohan, Stephanie Syptak-Ramnath, and Antony Blinken (collectively, “Defendants”). Plaintiff Rocio Davila filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 5), and Defendants filed a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 7). The Court took the matter under submission without oral argument on November 16, 2023. See ECF No. 6. Having carefully considered the Parties’ submissions and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion. / / / 26 27 28 1 All citations to the Opposition refer to the page numbers stamped to the upper right corner of the BACKGROUND Per the Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.