Bulnes

Bulnes v. Suez WTS Services USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20243:22-cv-01154California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Martin Bulnes, Case No. 22-cv-1154-BAS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

v. JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS WITH

Suez WTS Services USA, Inc.; GE PREJUDICE (ECF No. 30) Mobile Water, Inc.; and Does 1 through 15 100, 16 Defendant. 17 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s individual claims with prejudice. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff originally filed this case as a putative class action, but this Court dismissed the putative class claims without prejudice, closed the case, and ordered the parties to arbitration nearly a year ago. (ECF No. 28.) This allowed Plaintiff’s individual claims to survive as the parties proceeded into arbitration. Now, having completed arbitration, the parties jointly move to dismiss Plaintiff’s individual claims with prejudice. (ECF No. 30 at 1:13–23.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A), a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss its 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.