Wright

Wright v. San Diego Gas & Electric

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20243:24-cv-00404California814 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SANDRA WRIGHT, Case No.: 24-cv-404-CAB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. 1) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC et [Doc. No. 2]; and al., 12 Defendants. 2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(iii).

15 [Doc. Nos. 2, 3] 16

18 On February 29, 2024, Plaintiff Sandra Wright filed this civil action pro se against 19 San Diego Gas and Electric and the City of San Diego. [Doc. No. 1.] She did not prepay 20 the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, she filed 21 a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. 22 No. 2.] She also filed a request for appointment of counsel. [Doc. No. 3.]

I. Motion to Proceed IFP

24 Generally, all parties instituting a civil action in this court must pay a filing fee. See 25 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); CivLR 4.5(a). However, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.