Fonseca

Fonseca v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20243:22-cv-00757California7,999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PATTI F., Case No.: 22-cv-0757-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,2

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Patti F. (“Plaintiff”) appeals the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. [ECF No. 1, ¶ 3.] Plaintiff brings her appeal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review. [ECF No. 16.] The parties have consented to this Court for all purposes. [ECF No. 25.] 23 24 1 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court refers to all non-government parties by using their first name and last initial. 26 Martin O’Malley, the current Commissioner of Social Security, is automatically substituted as defendant for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.