Unknown

Zamora Cardenas v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20243:24-cv-00396California929 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID REINALDO ZAMORA CARDENAS, Case No.: 24-cv-0396-MMA (SBC)

Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING CASE v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UNKNOWN,

14 Respondent. 15 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (see Doc. No. 1), but has failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee and has failed to move to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons discussed below, the case is dismissed without prejudice. FAILURE TO SATISFY FILING FEE REQUIREMENT Because this Court cannot proceed until Petitioner has either paid the filing fee or qualified to proceed in forma pauperis, the Petition is subject to dismissal without prejudice. See CivLR 3.2; Rules 1(b), 3(a), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. If Petitioner wishes to proceed with this action, he must submit a copy of this order with the requisite $5.00 fee or adequate proof he cannot pay the fee. /// /// 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.