Mongkol Muay Thai Corporation v. JG (Thailand) Company Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20243:22-cv-00506California712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONGKOL MUAY THAI Case No. 22-cv-0506-BAS-KSC

CORPORATION,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 1. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. AMENDED EX PARTE

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME

JG (THAILAND) COMPANY LIMITED,

TO SERVE (ECF No. 29), and Defendant. 2. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND

TIME TO SERVE (ECF No. 28)

Before the Court is Plaintiff Mongkol Muay Thai Corporation’s (“Plaintiff” or “Mongkol”) Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending Time to Serve Defendant. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff initiated this action in April of 2023—almost a year ago—and the Clerk of Court issued a summons the same day. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 4(h)(2), if a corporation is served outside any judicial district of the United States, it must be served “in any manner prescribed by Rule 4(f) for serving an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.