Pope

Pope v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 1, 20243:21-cv-01102California9,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUTH POPE, an individual; Case No.: 21-CV-1102-JO-MMP 11 KRISTOFFER POPE, an individual, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs,

PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY

13 v. JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a public

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

entity; KALIHA JOHNSON, an individual; ROBYN CHARLTON, an 16 individual; MARY ROBILOTTA, an individual; DIANA SHRECKENGOST, an individual; DOE HHSA Workers 1-10, 18 known but unidentified individuals; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. 21 On June 11, 2021, Plaintiffs Ruth Pope and Kristoffer Pope filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against the County of San Diego and various County employees. Dkt. 1. They allege that Defendants violated their parental constitutional rights by subjecting their children to invasive examinations and unauthorized medical care while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.