Parker

Parker v. Manzano

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20243:22-cv-00001California4,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK RICHARD PARKER, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00001-RBM-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

MIMI MANZANO, et al., [Docs. 35, 42] Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendants Mimi Manzano, Christopher J. Marco, and Ymelda Valenzuela’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Damages (“Amended Complaint”). (Doc. 35.) Plaintiff Derek Richard Parker (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed an Opposition to the Motion (Doc. 37), and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. 39). The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (Doc. 41.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. /// /// /// I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background The Court dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.