Parker
Parker v. Manzano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK RICHARD PARKER, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00001-RBM-SBC
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO DISMISS
MIMI MANZANO, et al., [Docs. 35, 42] Defendants. 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendants Mimi Manzano, Christopher J. Marco, and Ymelda Valenzuela’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint for Damages (“Amended Complaint”). (Doc. 35.) Plaintiff Derek Richard Parker (“Plaintiff”), appearing pro se, filed an Opposition to the Motion (Doc. 37), and Defendants filed a Reply (Doc. 39). The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). (Doc. 41.) For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. /// /// /// I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Background The Court dismissed…