Fusa Franchisor SPV LLC v. Moda Collision Repair, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20243:23-cv-01559California2,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FUSA FRANCHISOR SPV LLC, a Case No.: 23-CV-1559 JLS (BGS) Delaware limited liability company,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, ANDREY STEFANCO’S MOTION v. TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

MODA COLLISION REPAIR, LLC dba

FIX AUTO VANCOUVER-WALNUT

(ECF No. 8) GROVE, a Washington limited liability company; and ANDREY STEFANCO, an 17 individual, 18 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is Defendant Andrey Stefanco’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8). Plaintiff FUSA Franchisor SPV LLC (“Plaintiff” or “FUSA”) filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 9), and Defendant submitted a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 13). The Court previously took this matter under submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). See ECF No. 12. Having carefully reviewed the Parties’ arguments and the law, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion. / / / / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.