Raiser

Raiser v. The United States District Court for the Southern District of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20243:23-cv-01894California5,454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, an individual, Case No.: 23-CV-1894 TWR (DDL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX

v. PARTE OMNIBUS MOTION;

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE

THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

APPLICATION; ORDERING

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF

PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

CALIFORNIA; AGENCY DIRECTOR,

WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

CASD; ALL NON-JUDICIAL STAFF

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF

OF CASD; KAREN BERETSKY;

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

JUDGE ROBERT MCNAMEE’S LAW

CLERK; SUSAN GELMIS; CHIEF (ECF Nos. 20, 22)

JUSTICE JOHN ROBERTS; ROSLYNN

MAUSKOPF; MARY MURGUIA; HON.

JANIS L. SAMMARTINO; JUDGE

CATHY ANN BENCIVENGO; HON.

ROBERT S. HUIE; HON. BARRY TED

MOSKOWITZ; HON. DANA M.

SABRAW; JUDGE KAREN S.

CRAWFORD; HON. CURIEL

GONZALO; CHARI L. BOWERY;

CHUCK SCHUMER; HOUSE

MAJORITY LEADER; PRESIDENT

JOSEPH BIDEN; DOES 1–150,

INCLUSIVE,

27 Defendants. 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.