Estate of William Hayden Schuck v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20243:23-cv-00785California2,240 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ESTATE OF WILLIAM HAYDEN Case No.: 3:23-cv-00785-DMS-AHG SCHUCK, et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiffs, JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY THE

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. 15 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [ECF Nos. 54, 56] 16 Defendants. 17 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 56; see also ECF No. 54. The parties seek an order from the Court extending the expert discovery deadline and pretrial motion filing deadline by approximately three months. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 47 at 5 (Amended Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); see also Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). “Good…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.