Spivey

Spivey v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 8, 20243:22-cv-00364California4,007 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA S., Case No.: 22cv0364-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND REMANDING TO

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

THE COMMISSIONER

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF NO. 15] 16 17 Maria S. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final administrative decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) regarding the denial of Plaintiff’s application for disability benefits and supplemental security income. (ECF No. 1.) The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff was not disabled and denied Plaintiff’s claim for benefits from January 18, 2018, through the date of the decision, March 1, 2021. (AR at 24 25 26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), “[o]pinions by the Court in [Social Security cases under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)] will refer to any non-government parties by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.