Lea

Lea v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20243:22-cv-01581California7,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLINA ALEXA LEA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01581-RBM-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT

16 [Doc. 30] 17 18 Presently before the Court is Defendants City of San Diego, Ace Ybanez, Joshua Clabough, Jason Gonzalez, Joshua Leiber, David Burns, Kevin Cummings, and Miles McCarde’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Kimberlina Alexa Lea’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“Motion to Dismiss”). (Doc. 30-1.) Plaintiff, appearing pro se, filed a response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (“Response”). (Doc. 32.) Defendants did not file a reply. The Court finds the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons discussed below, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.