Irizarry

Irizarry v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20243:22-cv-01423California2,820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 AIDA I., Case No. 22-cv-1423-DEB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MARTIN O’MALLEY, Acting DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION C ommissioner of Social Security, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. [DKT. NOS. 18, 20] 16 17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Aida I. seeks judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability benefits. Dkt. No. 1.2 The parties filed cross- motions for summary judgment, and Plaintiff filed a reply. Dkt. Nos. 18, 20–21. For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 18), GRANTS Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 20), and REMANDS this matter for further

1 Martin O’Malley is substituted for Kilolo Kijakazi pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

27 2 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.