Kaleopa

Kaleopa v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 29, 20243:24-cv-00363California1,550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 24-cv-363-BLM LUTERU KALEOPA,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

v. DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

PREPAYING OF FEES OR COSTS

MARTIN O’MALLEY,

Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [ECF No. 2]

17 The instant matter was initiated on February 23, 2024, when Plaintiff filed a complaint “for review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security.” ECF No. 1 at 1. That same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Motion”). ECF No. 2. Having reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint and Motion, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in district court without prepaying fees or costs and finds that Plaintiff’s amended complaint is sufficient to survive screening. Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.