Davison

Davison v. O'Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20243:24-cv-00051California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANTONIO MONTEREY D., Case No.: 3:3:24-cv-00051-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of

AND WITH LEAVE TO PAY THE

Social Security, FILING FEE Defendant. 12 [ECF 2] 13 14 15 Plaintiff has filed a Complaint seeking judicial review of a decision by the 16 Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF 1.) He has not paid 17 the civil filing fee required to commence this action, and by this motion, he moves to 18 proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). (ECF 2.) For the following reasons, the motion is 19 DENIED without prejudice and with leave to pay the filing fee. 20 All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 21 United States, except an application for a writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee. 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(a); see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (requiring a party instituting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.