Uribe

Uribe v. Capital One, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20243:23-cv-01297California526 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CUAHTEMOC VICTOR URIBE, Case No.: 23-cv-01297-H-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY

v. DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) CAPITAL ONE, N.A. d/b/a CAPITAL

ONE AUTO FINANCE; and DOES 1-10, [Doc. No. 18.] Defendants.

17 On July 14, 2023, Plaintiff Cuahtemoc Victor Uribe (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendant Capital One, N.A. d/b/a Capital One Auto Finance (“Defendant”). (Doc. No. 1.) On October 17, 2023, Defendant filed a notice of settlement. (Doc. No. 8.) On February 29, 2024, the parties filed a joint notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (Doc. No. 18.) The notice requested that Plaintiff’s individual claims be dismissed with prejudice and the putative class claims be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.) Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) permits a plaintiff to voluntarily dismiss an action without a 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.