Marin
Marin v. Ross Jr.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 23CV2083
Plaintiff,
v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO RECONSIDER AND
LARRY DALE ROSS, JR. AND
REOPENING THE CASE
ROADRUNNER SCOOTERS LLC,
15 Defendants. 16 17 18
As the Court previously explained, because Plaintiff failed to establish “good cause” why the contents of his application should be shielded from public view, his motion to seal his application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) was DENIED. Dkts. 2, 3, 4, 5; see Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 109698, 1102 (9th Cir. 2016). Plaintiff must either (1) file an IFP motion or (2) pay the civil filing fee by April 1, 2024. The Court cautions Plaintiff that failure to do either by April 1, 2024 will result in dismissal of this case. 27 28 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion to reconsider dismissal of the 2 || case and ORDERS the clerk of the court to reopen Plaintiff's case…