Patton
Patton v. O'Malley
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN P., Case No.: 24-cv-213-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. RENEWED APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of
Social Security, [Dkt. No. 7] Defendant.
On January 31, 2024, Plaintiff Adrian P. (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action against Defendant Martin O’Malley, Commissioner of Social Security, seeking review of the Commissioner’s final decision denying his application for Social Security benefits. See Dkt. No. 1. On February 16, 2024, the Court denied Plaintiff’s initial IFP motion because the Court was unable to assess Plaintiff’s financial circumstances given the limited information Plaintiff provided on a form not used in this District. Dkt. No. 5. Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s renewed Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“Renewed IFP Motion”). For the reasons…