Morales-Alfaro

Morales-Alfaro v. CoreCivic, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 12, 20243:20-cv-00082California6,198 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBIA MABEL MORALES- Case No.: 20-cv-82-LAB-BGS

ALFARO,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. 1) GRANTING CORECIVIC, INC.’S 14 RULE 59(e) MOTION FOR CORECIVIC, INC.; et al., RECONSIDERATION, [Dkt. 146]; and Defendants. 16 2) GRANTING CORECIVIC, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, [Dkt. 95]

Plaintiff Rubia Mabel Morales-Alfaro (“Morales”), an asylum seeker from El Salvador, filed suit against Defendants CoreCivic, Inc. (“CoreCivic”) and the United States for claims stemming from an alleged miscarriage she suffered on or about January 15, 2018, while in immigration custody. (Dkt. 50). The Court dismissed Morales’s only federal claim against the United States and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Morales’s remaining state law claims against CoreCivic. (Dkt. 139). CoreCivic now moves for reconsideration of the Court’s prior order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.