Finch

G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Finch

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20243:22-cv-02063California2,577 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 G & G CLOSED CIRCUIT EVENTS, Case No.: 22-cv-2063-AJB-MSB

LLC,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND Plaintiff,

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

13 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM FINCH, et

al., (Doc. No. 16) Defendants. 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for attorneys’ fees and costs. (Doc. No. 16.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On December 29, 2022, Plaintiff, a distributor of sports and entertainment programming, initiated this action against defendants Christopher William Finch and CWF Holdings, LLC (“CWF”) d/b/a Poor House Brewing and Supply (“Poor House Brewing”) (collectively “Defendants”), claiming Defendants unlawfully intercepted and displayed a boxing fight on Defendants’ televisions at Pour House Brewing without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.