Adams

Adams v. Grossmont Cuyamaca Community College District

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20243:23-cv-01220California3,230 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Alysha ADAMS, et al., Case No.: 23-cv-1220-AGS-DDL Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND (ECF 7) AND GRANTING

MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF 2)

GROSSMONT CUYAMACA

COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT,

7 et al., 8 Defendants. 9 Plaintiffs sued their community-college employers over COVID- vaccine mandates. The defense removed the case here, and plaintiffs now seek remand back to state court. The defense meanwhile moves to dismiss based on mootness and failure to state a claim. BACKGROUND This case’s 31 defendants include three community-college districts, their governing boards, and various presidents, chancellors, and employees sued “in their official capacities only.” (ECF 1, at 11–13.) In late 2021, defendants “adopted a COVID-19 vaccine requirement” compelling employees to “obtain the vaccine or submit an exemption thereto.” (Id. at 14, 17, 35–36.) Of the six plaintiffs, five requested…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.