Poinvil

Poinvil v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20243:23-cv-01344California2,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROSE P., Case No.: 23-cv-01344-AJB-JLB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION v. FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT

TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner JUSTICE ACT of Social Security,

Defendant. (Doc. No. 16) 16 Presently before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for: (1) attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); and (2) costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. (Doc. No. 16.) The Court decides the matter without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons set forth, the Court GRANTS the joint motion. I. BACKGROUND On July 24, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her claim for benefits. (Doc. No. 1.) After the Commissioner filed the administrative record,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.